Pagine

Friday, April 3, 2020

I cannot wait anymore

April the 2nd, 2020

Dear Mutsumi,

I really thank you for the photos. I am so happy to receive them.

But it is time for me to accept that you cannot overcome the hate you have against me and we cannot be friend. I have written 13 days ago and you haven’t answered yet. I don’t need yours answers though. I need that you follow what you have signed on the paper of the divorce!

If there is some problem you have to declare it. I am sick and tired that I have to beg to ask only what is written on the document. If I insist it seems that I am abusive. And sincerely I think that instead I am deeply respecting you.

I have suffered enough. I have renounced to a daughter, but the minimum we bargained is mine! 

In this way, you are stealing a right to Haruka. And you condemn her to a sad life.

If the problem is either you have another man or the problem is your mother, speak clearly! If the problem is that you don’t want to have contact with me, find another way to put me in contact with Haruka, but you have to fulfill the divorce settlement.

This situation is killing me, little by little. My body and life are already severely affected by the disease. Haven’t I already suffered enough? Is it possible to see Haruka through some Internet device? Give me what is up to me!

It will take long time before I can be in Japan again. The Covid19 pandemic, the stop of travels and above all, the economical crisis: who knows if I will have money to move. So I ask that you reshape your idea and give me as soon as possible the chance to be in contact with Haruka.

Bye.

Andrea

Father's day and CoViD19

March the 19th, 2020


Dear Mutsumi,

Today is father's day.
I continuously think about Haruka. I dream her in nights.

Now there is this Corona Virus. Even though hopefully everything will go well, it is really likely that for long time the chance I have to be in Japan is low. I don't believe that for November I can be in Japan because the Governments will close the borders. Actually there are already the borders closed!

In this perspective, I want to see Haruka through Internet or any other possible way.

You have said that you need time. So, please, you have to explain clearly the reasons why you cannot fulfilling the judgment settlement points. I am not forcing you to give answers or set the internet meeting, but I deserve some clarification.

I am worried also for you and your health even though it is better I don’t say anything about my feeling for you.

Now it is starting a new severe economical crisis. Let’s see how we can manage and cope with it.


Bye!


Andrea

P.S. Given the severe health situation in Italy if I die I have already given dispositions for let Haruka receives my money. If for some reason you are in shortage of money for Haruka, just let me know, I have a little amount of money for the emergencies I can send to you!

Re: Only Haruka

March the 2nd, 2020

Andrea

She is fine.  And we don’t need something for girls day.

Take care.

Only Haruka

March 1st, 2020

Dear Mutsumi


How is it going?



I am sorry bothering. But I have only Haruka left in this life. It is impossible for me to resist on thinking about Her. I think about her continuously and I remember often when I had her on my arms while walking in Tokyo’s streets.

I would have proposed to you to be in Italy for some days in May if you had time. But it is incredible that now there is also the Corona Virus! It limits travels and it impact dangerously on my work and business... I am not happy because I am investing a lot of money and time in a new business but I don’t have the results I expected. So I don’t have the money for Haruka and the travels. I am so sad.

And with this Corona Virus my job risks to be stopped since I work for the most part with tourism business and the new summer job starting from march, is completely related to border tourism. But I don’t have the intention to give up!



However, it needs to be short. (Although it is impossible for me to be... I would like tell you many things and all my feelings for Haruka, but at the same time I would like to avoid to write even only a sentence, in order to stop of bothering you! )


I want to send you my best wishes for your Birthday!


And, what a father should do as gift on girl’s day? I know it is late and I don’t want to disturb more on the 3 rd of March, but in the future if you may tell me something about it, I would appreciate.


I hope you all are well. If you have some news, please, let me know!


If you can, give a kiss to Haruka on her forehead by me…


Bye!


Andrea


Re[2]: Is everything alright?

February 11th, 2020

Ok! I wait. Just remember that I always think about Haruka. I was worried these days. Now I feel better.
Sorry for bothering.
Really thank you for the photos.
Bye!

Re: Is everything alright?

February 11th, 2020

Andrea

I need a time

Is everything alright?

February the 10th ,2020

Dear Mutsumi,
Is everything alright?
What about the photos of January and February?
What about Skype connections and the deal signed?
Bye.
Andrea

Judicial Settlement







Refusal letter to the Court


Tarcento, November 12th 2019

To:
Tokyo High Court
Chiyoda –Ku, Kasumigaseki 1-1-4
Tokyo
100-8933 Japan
Court Clerk: Takenouchi  Kouji    
Tel 03-3581-2010
Fax 03-3581-5529






東京高等裁判所 令和元年(ネ)第2597号 離婚等請求控訴事件
(原審:新潟家庭裁判所長岡支部 平成29年(家ホ)第11号離婚等請求事件)
Tokyo High Court, Reiwa Gannen (Ne) No.2597 Rikontou Seikyuu Kouso Jiken
(Original Court: Niigata Family Court Nagaoka Branch Heisei 29 Nen (Ie Ho) No. 11 Rikontou Seikyuu Jiken)

To whom it may concern,
The undersigned (Meneghetti Andrea) declares that he has received a summons from the High Court of Tokyo. The summons has been received September the 20th 2019. The summons has arrived through an e-mail of the Italian Consulate in Tokyo.
The undersigned cannot accept the summons of the High Court of Tokyo due to the fact this summons lacks in the minimum requirements.
The most obvious and gross faults and errors are listed:
- Having sent the summons via the Consulate doesn’t guarantee the Appellee that all the documents have been sent to him. These documents are necessary for the Appellee.
- In the documents received by the Appellee through the e-mail there isn’t any document that declares what has been effectively sent.
- Having sent the documents via an e-mail, not even certificated, doesn’t give a proof or a signature of the acceptance of the procedure. Actually, this implicit acceptance is not existing.
- It is been accepted that only the judgment of the Family Court of Nagaoka could be sent via the Consulate, but not all the communications of all Courts of Japan.
- In the documents received the Appellee cannot understand the procedures how to present his motivations in defense.
- The summons should have been arrived directly to the Appellee given the fact the answer cannot be done via the Consulate. In other words, the Consulate doesn’t work for the Appellee.
- Sending the summons via the Italian Consulate severely violates the privacy of the Appellee. How is possible that the Consulate knows the exchange of personal letter between the Appellant and the Appellee? How is possible that a Court makes a so gross violation of the privacy?
- Not all the files received by the Appellee were in a readable format.

The Appellee reckons that he has received only a portion of the documents of the Court. The documents received are chaotic and not translated.

It is obvious that having chosen this modality damages the Appellee. It limits the chances that the Appellee may provide a precise and complete answer. Consequently, the Appellee cannot have a satisfactory and clear defense (also for the analysis of the Court itself).
The situation is also more severe given the fact to the Appellee has been requested to pay the court costs of a court hearing that he hasn’t asked and that it is completely external to his will. In other words, the Appellee is summoned to a hearing in an improper and inadequate way. And the request to pay also for the expenses is meaningless.
Sending the summons for this supplementary hearing in this patchy and deficient mode, further invalidates the defendant’s rights for his defense.

In faith.

Andrea Meneghetti