A settlement.

October the 16th,2019

Andrea

 

How are you?

 

I gave an overview of the previous e-mail communication to my lawyer and asked him to modify the draft.

So please let me know whether the draft is fine with you.

 

Through our previous interactions, I think our relationship has moved forward a little. So I asked him to make the draft simple and clear and delete lengthy parts, but if you want to get back deleted parts (For example, detailed email communication way and so on), please tell me to have a satisfactory settlement for the future.

 

I'm getting ready for the meeting in November. I am sorry, but to use my money for Haruka’s daily life it would be helpful if you would bear our transportation and accommodation expenses. Let's think about the meal fee etc. on the spot. I think that it is less than 70,000 yen even if transportation expenses and accommodation expenses are combined. What do you think?

 

It's getting colder. Take care of yourself.

 

Mutsumi

東京高等裁判所　令和元年（ネ）第２５９７号　離婚等請求控訴事件

（原審：新潟家庭裁判所長岡支部　平成２９年（家ホ）第１１号離婚等請求事件）

Tokyo High Court, Reiwa Gannen (Ne) No.2597 Rikontou Seikyuu Kouso Jiken

(Original Court: Niigata Family Court Nagaoka Branch Heisei 29 Nen (Ie Ho) No. 11 Rikontou Seikyuu Jiken)

 

裁判上の和解条項（裁判所確認前の検討案）

Judicial Settlement Clauses (Draft before getting confirmation of the court)

 

１　控訴人（川内睦美）と被控訴人（メネゲッティ，アンドレア）は、本日離婚する。

Appellant (Mutsumi Kawauchi) and Appellee (Andrea Meneghetti) get a divorce today.

 

２　両当事者間の長女悠加（平成２７年８月１６日生）の親権者を母である控訴人と定める。

Appellant, the mother of Haruka, has the custody over the parties’ daughter, Haruka (Born on August 16, 2015).

 

３　控訴人と被控訴人は、少なくとも年１回、面会交流に要する交通費及び宿泊費を被控訴人が負担することを前提に、被控訴人と悠加との面会交流を行うものとする。その具体的な日時、場所及び方法等については、毎年１１月を念頭に、面会交流の都度、双方メールで協議して定める。控訴人と被控訴人は、前項の面会交流がイタリアで行われる場合に、悠加がイタリアの悠加の親戚と会うことができることを確認する。

Appellant and Appellee conduct the child visitation between Appellee and Haruka at least once a year supposing the fees for transportation and accommodation are borne by Appellee. Both parties agree, through their email communications, on the time, place, method, and so on for every visitation. Appellant and Appellee confirm that Haruka has the right to meet her relatives in Italy when the visitation is conducted in Italy.

 

４　控訴人と被控訴人は、スカイプ等のテレビ電話による面会交流について検討するものとする。また、面会交流の一環として、控訴人は、被控訴人が悠加にプレゼントを渡すことを希望する場合、これを受け取り悠加に渡すものとし、また、被控訴人に対し、悠加の写真をメールで送信するものとする。

Appellant and Appellee consider the child visitation through video conference such as Skype. Also, as the part of the child visitation, if Appellee hopes to give a present to Haruka, Appellant receives it and gives it to Haruka, and Appellant sends Haruka’s photos to Appellee by email.

 

５　控訴人と被控訴人は、悠加の心身の状況が、面会交流その他の控訴人と被控訴人と悠加との関係における最優先事項であることを確認する。

Appellant and Appellee confirm that Haruka’s physical and mental condition is the top priority of the relationship among Appellant, Appellee, and Haruka such as the child visitation.

 

６　控訴人と被控訴人は、相互に、相手方及びその家族について、非難するような一切の言動をとらないものとする。

Appellant and Appellee agree not to blame each other and each other’s families in any way.

 

７　本裁判上の和解は、東京高等裁判所の確定判決と同一の効力を有する。

This judicial settlement has the same legal effect as the final and binding judgment of Tokyo High Court.